SGE Exam Protocol
This test—designed and administered by Nicaea—is an historic first: a polymathic crucible bridging disciplines, requiring excellence, and redefining what it means to graduate.
1. Day-by-day structure
Overall Length: 21 consecutive days
Daily Schedule:
Morning Session: 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Afternoon Session: 1:00 PM – 4:00 PM
Every half-day addresses a thematic domain such as:
Pure Mathematics
Literature & Critical Theory
Engineering or Control Systems
Theoretical or Applied Physics
Philosophy or Theology
Economics or Statistics
Architecture or Design
Life Sciences or Biophysics
Law or Political Thought
2. Seating and Flow
Every morning, participants are given a random seating slip.
Desks are rotated daily to reduce comfort bias and simulate professional test conditions.
Every seat is isolated and wiped clean for optimal concentration.
3. Supplies Provided
Each scholar receives a personal supply kit on Day 1:
1 mechanical pencil
10 lead cartridges (0.5 mm)
5 erasers
100 sheets of fine paper (club-stamped)
Refills are provided as necessary, although use is loosely tracked for pacing sensitivity.
4. Tools and Limits by Subject
Pure Mathematics: No calculators or software. Pencil, ruler, and scratch paper only.
Applied Math / Sciences: Simulation tools may be used, but only in moderator-controlled settings.
Engineering: Drafting tools are acceptable.
Humanities (Literature, Philosophy, Law): Answers must be written. No reference texts or internet access.
Economics & Statistics: External equipment can be allowed for simulations but not any external equipment.
5. Conduct Expectations
No mobile phones, smartwatches, or electronic distractions during examination periods.
Silence is expected once every session begins.
Discussion is only allowed during breaks or after-day review.
Note: Disruptive behavior or cheating will result in being banned from the club. This community is based on mutual respect and discipline.
6. Exam Environment
Neutral lighting, spotless chairs, and ambient discretionary sound (classical or white noise).
Every session takes place in a respectful, distraction-free environment.
Lunch breaks between sessions are allowed. Shared or individual break areas are permitted.
7. Scoring and Assessment
All the answers are collected at the end of each session.
Peer judges or a group of rotating volunteers anonymously grade tests.
Scores attempt perfection, aiming for an average of 95% to achieve.
Optional evening or weekend oral exams or Disputatio sessions may be held to challenge verbal competence and argument.
Closing Reflection
This isn't a contest—it's a rehearsal for becoming.
Let each page speak not only of your knowledge, but your discipline.
You aren't being tested. You are forging yourself.
Since this club started three years ago, only one person has ever successfully passed this test. It's an experimental venture—designed to challenge, not to categorize. Your value is not determined by your grade, but by your courage to confront what few are brave enough to try. ❤️
Random Snippets of the exam!
Literature Subsection
Literature Subsection
Pure Mathematics Subsection
Pure Mathematics Subsection
Ready to write the sge?
Fill out the form below to confirm your request, use your U of T or approved personal email to verify your identity.
Please do not spam the form if you are not a member!